FinancialsVoteDocsDAO GraphExplore
← All proposals
    ←Previous#9#11Next→

    #10 Should Uniswap v3 be deployed to Polygon?

    executed

    Payment Status

    Description

    Should Uniswap v3 be deployed to Polygon? GFX Labs is submitting Polygon's governance proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 to Polygon on their behalf.

    The consensus check passed with 44M (98.87%) YES votes and 500k (1.13%) NO votes.

    The temperature check passed with 7.79M (~100%) YES votes and 101 (~0%) NO votes.

    The full proposal can be found here.

    Summary

    The Polygon team proposes to authorize Uniswap Labs to deploy Uniswap protocol to Polygon PoS on behalf of the community.

    We believe this is the right moment for Uniswap to deploy on Polygon, for several major reasons:

    • Polygon PoS has the second strongest DeFi ecosystem, right after Ethereum L1;
    • Deploying to Polygon PoS can bring a lot of benefits (user base growth, huge savings for users, higher user activity, higher revenue, market capture, return to the original DeFi vision etc);
    • We are willing to incentivize Uniswap adoption, financially and otherwise;
    • Polygon PoS is battle-tested;
    • Polygon is aligned with Ethereum and its values.

    We respectfully submit this proposal for your consideration, and we are looking forward to your questions and feedback.

    We would be willing to commit up to $20M for the aforementioned financial incentives, and we propose to use these funds in the following way:

    • Up to $15M for a long-term liquidity mining campaign;
    • Up to $5M towards the overall adoption of Uniswap on Polygon.

    In addition to the financial incentives we are offering will also be supporting the integration by:

    • Actively participate in the design and execution of liquidity mining campaigns;
    • Work with prominent projects in the Polygon DeFi ecosystem to help them understand the benefits of using Uniswap V3 as a “money lego.”
    • Promote Uniswap as a “money lego” on hackathons and other developer-focused events and efforts etc.

    On-chain voting

    This proposal has no on-chain functionality other than polling all Uniswap holders. Although the proposal already exceeded the 40m quorum threshold during the consensus check, the Uniswap community feels it is important to allow all UNI holders the opportunity to cast a vote. One important argument in favor of this decision is that Snapshot is not supported by custody providers like Coinbase, Anchorage, etc., smart contract wallets like Argent/Gnosis safe, or meta governance layers like Index & Compound.

    Governor Bravo requires at least one on-chain action, so the proposal includes a transfer of 0 UNI to satisfy the requirement.

    If the proposal passes this phase, the Uniswap Labs can deploy Uniswap on Polygon on behalf of the Uniswap community.

    For72,126,216 99%
    Against503,009 1%
    Abstain0 0%
    Quorumreached

    Timeline

    1. Pending
    2. Active
       
      block 13,786,993 → 13,827,313
    3. Succeeded
       
    4. Queued
       
    5. Executed
       

    Votes (75)

    0x2B1A…5fF4For · 15,000,039 UNI
    0xA2BF…D1d1For · 8,150,000 UNI
    0xe792…Cc2bFor · 8,000,000 UNI
    0xB062…9108For · 6,774,780 UNI
    0x683a…6C02For · 5,000,000 UNI
    0x458c…730EFor · 4,355,769 UNI
    0x8d07…A265For · 4,001,143 UNI
    0x067b…4A76For · 3,401,847 UNI
    0x0703…961bFor · 3,000,000 UNI
    0x13BD…8548For · 2,500,037 UNI
    0x9B68…2984For · 2,500,011 UNI
    0xdC1F…E432For · 2,500,000 UNI
    0x535b…723AFor · 2,500,000 UNI
    0xf63E…78C8For · 2,098,235 UNI
    0x46ab…b4d1For · 644,864 UNI
    0x1a13…7AA0For · 600,400 UNI
    0x5B3b…7c98For · 501,012 UNI
    0x7eD5…F7d3Against · 500,000 UNI
    0x159D…D630For · 300,000 UNI
    0xA7F6…d555For · 222,177 UNI
    0x8085…38bdFor · 40,638 UNI
    0x8e48…B1e9For · 17,053 UNI
    0x08A9…D265For · 9,255 UNI
    0x8944…F8C6Against · 2,678 UNI
    0x0be0…B852For · 1,276 UNI
    0x9549…606fFor · 1,201 UNI
    0x9185…024fFor · 1,003 UNI
    0x1936…E442For · 806 UNI
    0xCF7e…5515For · 614 UNI
    0x6316…5901For · 500 UNI
    0x9b61…2808For · 415 UNI
    0x7e1F…502aFor · 410 UNI
    0xd021…1067For · 401 UNI
    0x84E3…5a95For · 400 UNI
    0x4714…fc11For · 359 UNI
    0x3CfC…5fe9Against · 300 UNI
    0x128e…2b4fFor · 300 UNI
    0xbD16…a962For · 265 UNI
    0x30FE…8cb0For · 238 UNI
    0xF484…b4FcFor · 143 UNI
    0xa759…7aC6For · 104 UNI
    0x2FAE…08a8For · 102 UNI
    0x6a4a…874cFor · 101 UNI
    0xF444…c5d6For · 100 UNI
    0xFD82…8eE1Against · 30 UNI
    0x4152…be08For · 30 UNI
    0xA41a…5806For · 28 UNI
    0xd2c2…9F89For · 20 UNI
    0xCf56…E8d7For · 14 UNI
    0xb299…4888For · 12 UNI

    Voting timeline

    Proposal actions

    Caller
    Timelock
    0x1a9C…35BC
    →
    transfer→
    UNI
    0x1f98…F984
    dst→
    Proxy
    0x5e14…4a14
    ▶rawAmount
    rawAmountuint256
    0